Many researchers who work in engineering, mathematics, and other physical sciences find that using the typesetting language LaTeX is much easier for writing equations and other technical matter than Microsoft Word. In addition, many journals recognize this, and often provide the option to submit papers as LaTeX (.tex) files.
LetPub now offers a LaTeX document editing service via a program called . Overleaf allows for multiple contributors to create and revise LaTeX documents with a user-friendly, online platform, so revisions and commentary can be tracked by our editors and authors alike. Projects, with all revisions, can be returned simply by sending a link, which will allow authors to log on to Overleaf (free accounts including unlimited projects) and review the edits made to their document, without having to manage or compare separate files.
In addition to offering this cutting-edge editing service via our partnership with Overleaf, all manuscripts edited using Overleaf will receive high quality language editing performed by our certified language editors. LetPub is committed to promoting scientific excellence, advancing scholarly publishing technology, and partnering with leading academic societies, journals, and institutes to enable researchers around the world to showcase their knowledge. Our world leading editing service helps authors produce engineering and mathematics manuscripts that are published in high impact academic journals around the world.
Our track record allows us to offer the following guarantee: If the client accepts all recommended changes and the paper is still rejected by the journal solely for English language reasons, LetPub will re-edit the document for free or provide a full refund of the initial standard copy-editing service.
* Material added to your manuscript after the document is returned to the client or otherwise inaccessible by LetPub is not included in this guarantee.
The English editor (scientific editor) not only polished the English of our manuscript, including grammar, punctuation, and overall readability, but also significantly contributed to the academic expression by providing constructive feedback on the paper's framework, constituent elements, results, and conclusions. This included appropriately compressing lengthy or repetitive sections, suggesting structural modifications, identifying ambiguous passages, rewriting academic descriptions, questioning certain statements in the paper, and offering constructive academic suggestions. All of these insights and assistance have been very inspiring and helpful for us as authors. Thank you very much to the editor.